During the recent Virsys12-IDC webinar, “Modernizing Provider Data Management Without Losing Your Mind or Your Provider Network,“ healthcare experts addressed one of the industry’s most complex operational challenges: managing the intricate web of modern provider relationships that extend far beyond traditional payer-provider arrangements.
Moderator Alaina Kilpatrick, Product Manager at Virsys12, opened with a reality check: “When provider data is inaccurate or siloed, every downstream process suffers—claims, credentialing, contracting, and member satisfaction. In delegated models, the complexity multiplies fast.”
Today’s healthcare organizations must navigate delegated models involving Independent Practice Associations (IPAs), Management Services Organizations (MSOs), medical groups, and large health systems—each with unique hierarchies, governance structures, and provider data management requirements that demand sophisticated technological approaches to what experts call the “many-to-many relationship” challenge.
The Exponential Complexity of Delegated Models
“Delegated models really amplify the issues exponentially,” explains Tammy Hawes, CEO and founder of Virsys12. Organizations operating in this environment must simultaneously manage multiple types of provider relationships, each requiring different processes and oversight levels.
Modern healthcare organizations typically need capabilities for:
- In-house credentialing for direct provider relationships
- Delegated roster processing for larger health systems with their own credentialing capabilities
- Credentials Verification Organization (CVO) processing for specific states or lines of business
- Hybrid models that combine multiple approaches based on organizational needs
This multi-modal approach creates unprecedented complexity in provider data management, requiring systems that can handle vastly different relationship types while maintaining consistency and compliance across all models.
Beyond Direct Provider Relationships
Traditional provider data management assumes direct relationships between payers and individual providers. Today’s reality is far more complex. “You’re not really managing just a direct provider relationship anymore, you’re managing relationships with IPAs or MSOs or medical groups or huge national health systems,” notes Hawes.
These intermediary relationships create layers of complexity:
- Hierarchical Relationships: A single provider may belong to multiple provider groups, maintain an independent practice, and participate in various networks—each with different contract models and fee schedules.
- Specialty-Based Networks: Providers may practice in different specialties that connect them to specific health plans through distinct relationship structures and payment mechanisms.
- Geographic Variations: The same provider may face different relationships and credentialing requirements across states or regions.
- Value-Based Care Arrangements: Participation in risk-sharing, bundled payments, or quality-based incentive programs requires additional provider data tracking.
The Many-to-Many Relationship Challenge
Hawes describes this complexity as “managing the many-to-many relationship in provider network management.” This refers to the reality that:
- One provider can belong to multiple groups
- One group can serve multiple networks
- One network can have multiple contract types
- One contract can cover multiple specialties
- One specialty can have different payment structures
Legacy systems, designed for simpler one-to-one relationships, simply cannot handle this level of complexity effectively. “Legacy systems most likely don’t have the ability to do that,” Hawes explains.
Real-World Impact: A Case Study in Complexity
The scale of this challenge becomes clear when examining real-world implementations. Hawes shared an example of one health plan that was “managing over 47 different types of delegated relationships, covering about 12,000 providers.”
Before implementing a sophisticated provider data management system, this organization faced several critical limitations:
Lack of Real-Time Visibility
“They really had no visibility real-time into the delegated credentialing status versus their in-house credentialing status,” explains Hawes. This blind spot created compliance risks and operational inefficiencies.
Before implementing a modern provider data management platform, the plan faced:
- Lack of Real-Time Visibility: “They really had no visibility real-time into the delegated credentialing status versus their in-house credentialing status,” Hawes explained.
- Compliance Surprises: “They were always surprised by different compliance issues that would come up” because of limited oversight.
- Manual Process Redundancy: Separate tracking systems for different relationship types led to duplicated effort and inconsistent provider directory data.
The Technology Solution: Hierarchical Data Models
Addressing this complexity requires technology platforms built specifically for healthcare’s many-to-many relationships. “We’ve built core capabilities to address this. First, we have this hierarchical data model that mirrors the real-world relationships,” explains Hawes.
This approach recognizes that provider data management must accommodate:
Multi-Level Provider Affiliations
- Provider belongs to multiple groups
- Groups participate in various networks
- Networks serve different health plans
- Plans offer different products and specialties
Dynamic Relationship Mapping
- Same provider, different contract models based on affiliation
- Same group, different fee schedules by specialty
- Same specialty, different payment structures by location
- Same location, different network participation by insurance line
Granular Data Management
“Our V12 platform allows for all those relationships and all that complexity at a very, very granular level,” notes Hawes. This granularity enables organizations to manage the precise details that determine provider payment, network inclusion, and compliance status.
Measurable Transformation Results
Organizations that implement sophisticated provider data management systems for complex relationships see dramatic improvements:
- Operational Efficiency: “The time they spent on manual data updates dropped by about 70%,” reported Hawes
- Compliance Excellence: “Their NCQA audit prep went down from like three months to less than three weeks,” thanks to automated documentation and real-time visibility
- Strategic Visibility: Real-time insight into delegated relationships, CVO processes, and in-house credentialing status.
- Data Efficiency: “They can share the data that’s similar between the different networks and the different relationships, such as basic demographic information, eliminating redundant data collection and maintenance,” Hawes added
Market Transformation Capabilities
Beyond operational improvements, sophisticated provider data management enables strategic market transformation. “It really changed the way they were able to go to market,” explains Hawes.
Organizations with proper systems can:
- Rapidly expand into new geographic markets
- Launch innovative products that require complex provider network configurations
- Respond quickly to competitive pressures and market opportunities
- Scale operations without proportional increases in administrative overhead
The Implementation Challenge
While the benefits are clear, implementing systems capable of handling complex provider relationships requires significant organizational commitment. “This is truly hard work. This is not just snapping your fingers and implementing a new system,” acknowledges Hawes.
Successful implementations require:
- Comprehensive relationship mapping to understand all current provider affiliations
- Process standardization across different relationship types where possible
- Change management to help teams adapt to new workflows
- Phased rollout to manage complexity and minimize disruption
- Ongoing optimization as relationships and market conditions evolve
The Competitive Imperative
Organizations that successfully manage complex provider relationships at scale gain sustainable competitive advantages. They can:
Operational Excellence
- Handle more provider relationships with the same or fewer resources
- Maintain compliance across all relationship types simultaneously
- Respond quickly to provider changes or market opportunities
Strategic Agility
- Design innovative network configurations that competitors cannot match
- Enter new markets with confidence in provider data accuracy
- Scale growth without operational limitations
Provider Satisfaction
“Providers are going to be much happier if they can get through this process without friction and they get through it quickly so that they can get paid,” notes Hawes.
The Path Forward
As healthcare continues evolving toward more complex provider relationships and value-based care models, organizations must invest in systems capable of handling this complexity. “There is light at the end of the tunnel for organizations willing to make the investment and do the hard work required,” Hawes assured.
Those who continue to rely on legacy provider data systems designed for simpler relationships will struggle as market complexity grows.
Organizations that act now to build modern provider data management capabilities will be best positioned for future growth and market opportunities.
Ready to master the complexity of delegated models and hierarchical provider relationships? Contact us to discover how V12 Enterprise‘s hierarchical data model can help your organization manage thousands of complex provider relationships with precision and efficiency.
Keep up with Virsys12 and how we are eliminating inefficiencies in healthcare by following us on LinkedIn and X.
